Quick recall · 414 cards
Short MCQ-style retrieval prompts. Tap a card to reveal the answer.
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
What is the punishment prescribed under Section 66C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 for identity theft?
B · Imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to Rs. 1 lakh
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Under the Information Technology Act, 2000, what is the punishment for stealing computer documents, assets or software source code from any organization or individual?
C · 3 years imprisonment and Rs. 500,000 fine
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
When did the Information Technology Act, 2000 come into force?
B · 17th October 2000
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
To which geographical areas does the Information Technology Act, 2000 apply?
C · In India and outside India by any person
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
What is the maximum compensation that can be imposed under the Information Technology Act, 2000 for unauthorized access or damage to computer systems?
C · Up to Rs. 1 crore
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the Information Technology Act, 2000 deals with unauthorized access to computer systems?
B · Section 66
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Under the Information Technology Act, 2000, what is the liability for a person who, without permission of the owner, damages any computer, computer system or computer network?
B · Up to Rs. 1 crore compensation
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT covered under unauthorized access provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000?
D · Authorized access to one's own computer system
PYQ · 2020
Tap to reveal →
According to IT Act 2000, whoever commits hacking is liable for:
B · Imprisonment upto three years or fine which may extend upto two lakh rupees or both
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
What type of cyber-crime, its laws and punishments does section 66 of the Indian IT Act holds?
A · Cracking or illegally hack into any system
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Penalty and Compensation for damage to computer, computer system, etc is provided under Section.......... of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
(1) 43
(2) 44
(3) 45
(4) 46
A · 43
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
What type of cyber-crime, its laws and punishments does section 66 of the Indian IT Act holds?
A · Cracking or illegally hack into any system
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Under the Information Technology Act, 2000, 'access code' refers to which of the following?
B · A secret code for accessing a computer resource
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 deals with punishment for dishonestly receiving stolen computer resource or communication device using an access code?
A · A) Section 66B
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 deals with the punishment for violation of privacy?
D · 66 E
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Section 66C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 deals with punishment for:
C · C
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
The punishment for identity theft under Section 66C of IT Act 2000 is:
C · Three year imprisonment or 1 lakh rupees penalty
Identity theft under Section 66C carries punishment of imprisonment up to three years and fine up to Rs. 1 lakh. This matches option C: 'Three year imprisonment or 1 lakh rupees penalty'.[2]
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the Information Technology Act, 2000, how is a 'Computer' defined?
A · Any electronic, magnetic, optical, or other high-speed data processing device
The IT Act defines 'Computer' broadly as any electronic, magnetic, optical, or other high-speed data processing device.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following devices would NOT be considered a 'Computer' under the IT Act, 2000?
B · A traditional mechanical calculator
The definition includes electronic or magnetic devices capable of data processing; a mechanical calculator does not qualify.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the scope of the term 'Computer' under the IT Act, 2000?
B · Any device capable of storing, processing, and retrieving data electronically
The Act includes any device capable of electronic data storage, processing, and retrieval, regardless of internet connectivity.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
The definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act, 2000 includes which of the following components?
A · Input devices, output devices, and storage devices
The definition encompasses hardware components such as input, output, and storage devices as integral parts of a computer.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT included as a component in the definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act, 2000?
C · Human operators
Human operators are not components of a computer; the definition includes physical hardware components only.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the inclusion of software in the definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Software is explicitly included as part of the computer
The definition includes software as part of the computer since it is essential for data processing and operation.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following legal implications arises from the definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act, 2000?
B · All devices defined as computers are subject to offences under the Act
The broad definition ensures all devices classified as computers are covered under the Act for offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
How does the definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act, 2000 impact the prosecution of offences related to data theft?
B · It allows prosecution for offences involving any electronic data processing device
The broad definition allows offences involving any electronic data processing device to be prosecuted under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a complex legal implication of the definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act, 2000?
A · It creates ambiguity about liability for offences involving cloud computing
The broad definition raises complex issues regarding liability and jurisdiction in cloud computing and virtual environments.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best distinguishes a 'Computer' from a 'Computer Network' under the IT Act, 2000?
A · A computer is a single device; a computer network is an interconnected system of computers
A computer is an individual device, whereas a computer network is a system of interconnected computers.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a correct distinction between a 'Computer' and a 'Computer Network' under the IT Act, 2000?
B · A computer network can operate without any computers
A computer network cannot operate without computers; this option is incorrect.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In the context of the IT Act, 2000, which statement best explains the difference between a computer and a computer network?
B · A computer network is a collection of interconnected computers enabling communication
A computer network is a system of interconnected computers that communicate and share resources.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a complex distinction between 'Computer' and 'Computer Network' under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Liability for offences can differ based on whether the offence involves a single computer or a network
Legal liability may vary depending on whether an offence involves an individual computer or a networked system.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act, 2000, what does the term 'Computer Resource' include?
B · Hardware, software, data, and communication facilities related to a computer
The term 'Computer Resource' includes hardware, software, data, and communication facilities associated with a computer.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the scope of 'Computer Resource' under the IT Act, 2000?
B · Includes hardware, software, data, and network resources
The scope of 'Computer Resource' is broad, covering hardware, software, data, and communication facilities.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT included in the interpretation of 'Computer Resource' under the IT Act, 2000?
C · Human operators
Human operators are not considered part of computer resources under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a complex aspect of the scope of 'Computer Resource' under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Whether cloud storage qualifies as a computer resource
The inclusion of cloud storage raises complex legal questions about the scope of computer resources.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In the context of the IT Act, 2000, which of the following best explains the legal relevance of the definition of 'Computer' for computer offences?
B · It extends the scope of offences to all devices defined as computers
The definition broadens the scope of offences to include all devices classified as computers under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
How does the definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act, 2000 affect the prosecution of offences involving unauthorized access?
B · Any device defined as a computer can be subject to prosecution
The broad definition allows prosecution for unauthorized access to any device classified as a computer.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a complex legal implication of the definition of 'Computer' in relation to offences under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Determining jurisdiction for offences involving virtual machines
The definition raises complex jurisdictional issues for offences involving virtual or cloud-based computing environments.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
According to the Information Technology Act 2000, which of the following best defines a 'Computer'?
B · Any electronic, magnetic, optical, or similar device capable of storing, processing, and retrieving data
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT included in the definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act 2000?
D · Manual typewriters
Manual typewriters are not electronic or magnetic devices and hence are excluded from the definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which phrase correctly completes the definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act 2000?
B · A device that includes hardware, software, and data capable of performing logical, arithmetic, and memory functions
The IT Act 2000 includes hardware, software, and data as integral parts of a computer, which performs logical, arithmetic, and memory functions.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which of the following would be considered a 'Computer'?
A · A smartphone with installed applications and data
A smartphone is an electronic device with hardware, software, and data processing capabilities, thus falling under the definition of a computer as per the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the scope of 'Computer' in the IT Act 2000?
B · Any electronic device capable of data processing, including embedded systems
The IT Act 2000 defines a computer broadly to include any electronic device capable of data processing, which covers embedded systems and not just traditional computers.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following components is explicitly included in the definition of a computer under the IT Act 2000?
B · Hardware, software, and data
The IT Act 2000 includes hardware, software, and data as integral parts of the definition of a computer.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is considered a 'component' of a computer as per the IT Act 2000?
B · Software programs and data stored within the device
The definition includes software programs and data stored within the device as components of a computer.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best illustrates the components covered under the definition of a computer in the IT Act 2000?
B · Hardware, software, data, and storage devices
The IT Act 2000 includes hardware, software, data, and storage devices as parts of the computer definition.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT considered a component of a computer resource under the IT Act 2000?
D · Manual filing cabinets
Manual filing cabinets are not electronic or digital and thus are not considered computer resources under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
The term 'Computer Resource' under the IT Act 2000 includes which of the following?
B · Hardware, software, data, and communication facilities
Computer Resource is broadly defined to include hardware, software, data, and communication facilities as per the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes 'Computer Resource' as per the IT Act 2000?
B · Any resource related to computer hardware, software, data, and communication facilities
The IT Act 2000 defines Computer Resource to include hardware, software, data, and communication facilities.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of a 'Computer Resource' under the IT Act 2000?
A · A server with installed operating system and stored data
A server with operating system and data qualifies as a computer resource, including hardware, software, and data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements about 'Computer Resource' under the IT Act 2000 is correct?
B · It includes hardware, software, data, and communication facilities
The definition of Computer Resource includes hardware, software, data, and communication facilities as per the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which legal implication arises from the broad definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act 2000?
B · Offences can be committed using a wide range of electronic devices including embedded systems
The broad definition allows the Act to cover offences committed using various electronic devices, not limited to traditional computers.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a legal consequence of the IT Act 2000’s definition of 'Computer'?
B · Unauthorized access to any device defined as a computer can attract penalties
Unauthorized access to any device that falls under the definition of a computer is punishable under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which of the following offences can be committed using a device defined as a 'Computer'?
B · Hacking, data theft, and unauthorized access
The Act covers offences like hacking, data theft, and unauthorized access involving any device defined as a computer.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best explains the legal importance of distinguishing a 'Computer' from other digital devices under the IT Act 2000?
B · To ensure offences involving digital devices are covered under the Act
Distinguishing helps ensure that offences involving a wide range of digital devices are covered under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following devices is considered distinct from a 'Computer' under the IT Act 2000 due to its limited functionality?
B · Digital cameras without processing capabilities
Digital cameras without data processing capabilities are distinct from computers as per the Act’s definition.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best distinguishes a 'Computer' from other digital devices under the IT Act 2000?
A · Computers can process, store, and retrieve data, while some digital devices may only store data
The key distinction is that computers perform processing, storage, and retrieval, whereas some digital devices may have limited functions.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which device would NOT be classified as a 'Computer' under the IT Act 2000 due to its primary function?
B · A digital thermometer without data processing capability
A digital thermometer without data processing capabilities does not meet the definition of a computer under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
The definition of 'Computer' under the IT Act 2000 extends to which of the following in relation to networks and communication devices?
B · Computers connected to networks and communication devices used for data transmission
The definition includes computers connected to networks and communication devices that facilitate data transmission.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the scope of the term 'Computer' in relation to communication devices as per the IT Act 2000?
B · It includes communication devices that are capable of data processing and storage
Communication devices capable of data processing and storage fall within the scope of 'Computer' under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following network-related devices would be covered under the definition of 'Computer' in the IT Act 2000?
A · A router with embedded software and data processing capability
A router with embedded software and data processing capabilities is considered a computer under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding the scope of 'Computer' under the IT Act 2000?
A · The definition excludes devices used solely for communication without data processing
Devices used solely for communication without data processing are excluded from the definition under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best defines 'Unauthorized Access to Computer Resource' under the IT Act 2000?
B · Accessing a computer system without permission or exceeding authorized access
Unauthorized access refers to accessing a computer system or network without permission or exceeding the access rights granted.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which of the following actions constitutes unauthorized access to a computer resource?
B · Accessing a colleague’s computer without their knowledge
Accessing someone else's computer without permission is unauthorized access under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 deals with penalties for unauthorized access to computer resources?
B · Section 66
Section 66 of the IT Act 2000 prescribes penalties for hacking and unauthorized access to computer resources.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following scenarios is an example of unauthorized access under the IT Act 2000?
B · A hacker bypassing login credentials to enter a system
Bypassing login credentials without authorization is unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A person who accesses a computer system without permission and deletes critical data can be charged under which provision of the IT Act 2000?
A · Section 43
Section 43 deals with penalties for unauthorized access and damage to computer resources including deletion of data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following acts is considered 'Hacking' under the IT Act 2000?
B · Gaining unauthorized access to a computer system to cause damage
Hacking involves unauthorized access with intent to cause damage or steal data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, what is the punishment for hacking that causes damage to a computer system or data?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to Rs. 5 lakh
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to Rs. 5 lakh for hacking causing damage.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT an example of hacking under the IT Act 2000?
B · Accessing a system with authorized credentials
Accessing a system with authorized credentials is not hacking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A hacker gains unauthorized access to a bank’s computer system and transfers funds illegally. Under the IT Act 2000, this act is punishable under which section?
B · Section 66
Section 66 deals with hacking and related offences including unauthorized fund transfer.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following constitutes 'Data Theft' under the IT Act 2000?
B · Stealing data from a computer system without authorization
Data theft involves stealing data without authorization.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which section deals with penalties for damage to computer data or programs?
A · Section 43
Section 43 prescribes penalties for damage to computer data or programs.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following actions is an example of data damage under the IT Act 2000?
A · Deleting files without authorization
Deleting files without authorization constitutes data damage.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A person copies confidential data from a company’s computer without permission. Which section of the IT Act 2000 applies?
A · Section 43
Section 43 covers unauthorized copying or extraction of data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a correct punishment for data damage under the IT Act 2000?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to Rs. 5 lakh
Data damage attracts imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to Rs. 5 lakh under Section 66.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Identity theft under the IT Act 2000 involves which of the following actions?
A · Using someone else's electronic signature without permission
Identity theft involves fraudulent use of another person's electronic signature or identity.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 specifically deals with punishment for identity theft?
C · Section 66C
Section 66C deals with punishment for identity theft and impersonation.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of impersonation under the IT Act 2000?
B · Using someone else’s digital signature without authorization
Impersonation involves using another person's digital signature or identity without permission.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A person creates a fake digital identity to commit fraud. Under which section of the IT Act 2000 can they be prosecuted?
C · Section 66C
Section 66C punishes identity theft including creation or use of fake digital identities.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes 'Computer Sabotage' under the IT Act 2000?
B · Deliberate damage or disruption of computer systems or data
Computer sabotage involves intentional damage or disruption to computer systems or data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of computer trespass under the IT Act 2000?
A · Accessing a computer system beyond authorized limits
Computer trespass involves accessing a system beyond authorized rights.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which section deals with penalties for computer sabotage?
B · Section 66
Section 66 prescribes penalties for computer sabotage and related offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A person intentionally introduces a virus into a company’s computer system causing damage. What is the likely punishment under the IT Act 2000?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to Rs. 5 lakh
Introducing a virus causing damage is punishable under Section 66 with imprisonment and fine.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Section 43 of the IT Act 2000 primarily deals with which of the following?
A · Compensation for damage to computer systems
Section 43 deals with compensation for unauthorized access and damage to computer systems.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 prescribes punishment for identity theft and impersonation?
B · Section 66C
Section 66C specifically addresses identity theft and impersonation.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 provides protection against disclosure of information by intermediaries?
C · Section 72
Section 72 deals with breach of confidentiality and privacy by intermediaries.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which section provides for punishment for hacking with computer system damage?
B · Section 66
Section 66 prescribes punishment for hacking causing damage to computer systems.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following penalties is prescribed under the IT Act 2000 for unauthorized access causing damage to computer systems?
B · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to Rs. 5 lakh
Unauthorized access causing damage attracts imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to Rs. 5 lakh under Section 66.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a possible punishment for identity theft under the IT Act 2000?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine
Identity theft is punishable with imprisonment up to 3 years and fine under Section 66C.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A person is convicted of hacking causing data damage. What is the maximum imprisonment term under the IT Act 2000?
B · 3 years
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years for hacking causing damage.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a defense under the IT Act 2000 against charges of unauthorized access?
A · Access was authorized or consented by the owner
Authorization or consent by the owner is a valid defense against unauthorized access charges.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT considered a valid defense under the IT Act 2000 for computer offences?
C · Access without any permission but no damage caused
Access without permission is unauthorized even if no damage is caused; it is not a valid defense.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which of the following can be a valid exception to liability for computer offences?
A · Accessing computer resource with owner’s consent
Access with owner’s consent is an exception to liability under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes 'Unauthorized Computer Access' under the IT Act 2000?
B · Accessing a computer system without permission or exceeding authorized access
Unauthorized Computer Access involves accessing a computer system without permission or exceeding the access rights granted, which is prohibited under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which of the following actions constitutes unauthorized access to a computer resource?
B · Accessing a colleague’s computer without permission
Accessing a colleague’s computer without permission is unauthorized access, which is punishable under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates unauthorized computer access?
B · A hacker bypassing security to enter a government database
A hacker bypassing security to enter a government database is a clear case of unauthorized computer access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT an example of unauthorized computer access under the IT Act 2000?
C · Accessing one’s own computer system
Accessing one’s own computer system is authorized access and does not constitute unauthorized computer access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best defines 'Computer Access' as per the IT Act 2000?
B · Access to a computer system or network through any means including remote access
The IT Act 2000 defines computer access broadly as accessing a computer system or network by any means, including remote access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which of the following would NOT be considered 'computer access'?
D · Reading printed documents from a computer
Reading printed documents is not computer access since it does not involve accessing the computer system or network itself.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
How does the IT Act 2000 define 'access' to a computer system?
B · Use of any means to interact with or retrieve data from a computer system or network
Access includes any means to interact with or retrieve data from a computer system or network, including remote access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements about 'Computer Access' under the IT Act 2000 is TRUE?
C · Access includes both physical and electronic means of interacting with a computer system
The Act considers both physical and electronic means as forms of computer access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under Section 43 of the IT Act 2000, which of the following penalties may be imposed for unauthorized access causing damage to a computer system?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to 5 lakh rupees
Section 43 provides for imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to 5 lakh rupees for unauthorized access causing damage.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following acts is punishable under Section 43 of the IT Act 2000?
A · Deleting data from a computer system without permission
Deleting data without permission is unauthorized access causing damage, punishable under Section 43.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under Section 43 of the IT Act 2000, which of the following is NOT a consequence of unauthorized access?
D · Death penalty
The IT Act 2000 does not prescribe death penalty for unauthorized access under Section 43.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the scope of penalties under Section 43 of the IT Act 2000 for unauthorized computer access?
B · Imprisonment and/or fine depending on the nature and extent of damage caused
Section 43 provides for imprisonment and/or fine depending on the damage caused by unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Section 66 of the IT Act 2000 deals with which of the following offences?
B · Computer-related offences including hacking and identity theft
Section 66 specifically addresses computer-related offences such as hacking, identity theft, and related crimes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a punishable offence under Section 66 of the IT Act 2000?
A · Hacking into a computer system
Hacking is a punishable offence under Section 66 of the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under Section 66 of the IT Act 2000, what is the maximum punishment for hacking a computer system?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to 5 lakh rupees
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to 5 lakh rupees for hacking offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following offences is covered under Section 66C of the IT Act 2000?
A · Identity theft
Section 66C specifically deals with identity theft under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is TRUE regarding Section 66D of the IT Act 2000?
A · It deals with cheating by personation using computer resources
Section 66D addresses cheating by personation using computer resources, such as phishing or impersonation.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a type of computer offence related to access under the IT Act 2000?
D · Software licensing
Software licensing violations are not classified as offences related to unauthorized access under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following offences involves illegally obtaining someone else’s personal information using a computer?
B · Identity theft
Identity theft involves illegally obtaining and using someone else’s personal information.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes 'data theft' under the IT Act 2000?
A · Unauthorized copying or transfer of data from a computer system
Data theft involves unauthorized copying or transfer of data from a computer system.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of hacking under the IT Act 2000?
A · Accessing a computer system using stolen credentials
Hacking includes accessing a computer system using stolen credentials without authorization.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is the most severe punishment for legal consequences under the IT Act 2000 related to computer offences?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to 5 lakh rupees
The IT Act 2000 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to 5 lakh rupees for serious computer offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following legal consequences may be imposed for identity theft under the IT Act 2000?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to 1 lakh rupees
Identity theft under Section 66C attracts imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to 1 lakh rupees.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is TRUE about punishments under the IT Act 2000 for computer offences?
A · Punishments vary depending on the nature and gravity of the offence
The IT Act 2000 prescribes punishments that vary according to the offence’s nature and severity, including fines and imprisonment.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following offences under the IT Act 2000 can lead to imprisonment for up to 3 years and a fine?
A · Hacking and identity theft
Hacking and identity theft are serious offences punishable with imprisonment and fines under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a valid defense under the IT Act 2000 against charges of unauthorized computer access?
A · Access was authorized or consented by the owner
Authorization or consent by the owner is a valid defense against unauthorized access charges.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT considered a defense under the IT Act 2000 for unauthorized access?
D · Access was done to cause damage
Access done to cause damage is not a valid defense under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following procedural aspects is essential for enforcement under the IT Act 2000?
A · Investigation by authorized officers
Investigation by authorized officers is essential for enforcement and prosecution under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which authority is empowered to investigate offences related to unauthorized computer access under the IT Act 2000?
A · Police officers not below the rank of Sub-Inspector
Police officers of the rank of Sub-Inspector or above are empowered to investigate offences under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following procedural steps is mandatory before initiating prosecution under the IT Act 2000 for computer offences?
A · Filing a complaint and investigation by authorized officer
A complaint must be filed and an investigation conducted by authorized officers before prosecution under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the correct definition of 'Unauthorized Access' under the Information Technology Act, 2000?
B · Accessing a computer system or network without permission or exceeding authorized access
Unauthorized Access refers to accessing a computer system or network without permission or exceeding the authorized access granted by the owner, which is prohibited under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes unauthorized access according to the IT Act, 2000?
B · Accessing a computer system without any form of permission
Unauthorized access involves accessing a computer system without any form of permission, which is an offense under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following scenarios constitutes unauthorized access under the IT Act, 2000?
B · Accessing a colleague's computer without their knowledge
Accessing a colleague's computer without their knowledge is unauthorized access as it is done without permission.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 primarily deals with unauthorized access to computer systems?
A · Section 43
Section 43 of the IT Act, 2000 deals with penalties and compensation for damage caused by unauthorized access to computer systems.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act, 2000, which of the following is NOT a legal provision related to unauthorized access?
D · Section 100 - Cyber terrorism
Section 100 does not exist under the IT Act, 2000. Cyber terrorism is covered under Section 66F.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements about unauthorized access under the IT Act, 2000 is correct?
B · Unauthorized access includes accessing protected systems without permission
Unauthorized access includes accessing protected computer systems or networks without permission, regardless of whether data is deleted or altered.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a correct interpretation of Section 43(1) of the IT Act, 2000 regarding unauthorized access?
B · It provides compensation for damage caused by unauthorized access
Section 43(1) provides for compensation to the affected party for damage caused by unauthorized access or use of computer resources.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which clause of Section 43 specifically deals with accessing a protected computer without permission and downloading data?
B · Section 43(b)
Section 43(b) deals with unauthorized downloading, copying or extraction of data from a protected computer.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following acts is covered under Section 43(c) of the IT Act, 2000?
B · Deleting or altering information without permission
Section 43(c) covers unauthorized deletion or alteration of information residing in a computer system.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under Section 43 of the IT Act, 2000, which clause addresses the introduction of viruses or malware into a computer system?
B · Section 43(e)
Section 43(e) deals with introducing or causing to introduce any computer contaminant or virus.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which clause of Section 43 prescribes penalty for damaging or disrupting computer systems by unauthorized access?
A · Section 43(d)
Section 43(d) deals with damaging or disrupting computer systems or networks by unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Section 66 of the IT Act, 2000 primarily deals with which of the following offenses?
B · Hacking and related cyber offenses
Section 66 deals with hacking and related offenses such as identity theft and cheating by personation using computer resources.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following offenses is punishable under Section 66C of the IT Act, 2000?
B · Identity theft using computer resources
Section 66C specifically deals with punishment for identity theft using computer resources.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under Section 66D of the IT Act, 2000, which offense is addressed?
B · Cheating by personation using computer resources
Section 66D deals with cheating by personation using computer resources, such as phishing and impersonation.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following offenses under Section 66F of the IT Act, 2000 is considered the most serious?
C · Cyber terrorism
Section 66F deals with cyber terrorism, which is considered a serious offense under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the maximum imprisonment term prescribed under Section 66 of the IT Act, 2000 for hacking offenses?
B · Up to 3 years
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or a fine or both for hacking offenses.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following penalties is prescribed under Section 43 of the IT Act, 2000 for unauthorized access causing damage?
C · Compensation to the affected party
Section 43 prescribes compensation to the affected party for damage caused by unauthorized access, not imprisonment.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a punishment under Section 66C of the IT Act, 2000 for identity theft?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to 1 lakh rupees
Section 66C prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years and a fine up to 1 lakh rupees for identity theft.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act, 2000, which of the following is a possible penalty for hacking under Section 66?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both for hacking offenses regardless of damage.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a defense under the IT Act, 2000 against charges of unauthorized access?
A · Accessing a system with prior written permission
Accessing a system with prior written permission is a valid defense against unauthorized access charges.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is considered an exception under the IT Act, 2000 for unauthorized access?
A · Access by a security auditor with consent
Authorized security auditors accessing systems with consent are exempted from unauthorized access charges.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a valid defense against unauthorized access under the IT Act, 2000?
C · Accessing without permission but with good intentions
Accessing without permission, even with good intentions, is not a valid defense under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a common method of unauthorized access?
A · Hacking through exploiting system vulnerabilities
Hacking by exploiting system vulnerabilities is a common method of unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Phishing is categorized under which type of unauthorized access method?
A · Social engineering attack
Phishing is a social engineering attack used to deceive users into revealing sensitive information.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of unauthorized access using technical means?
A · Using malware to gain control of a system
Using malware to gain control of a system is a technical method of unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following methods is considered a sophisticated form of unauthorized access?
A · Advanced persistent threat (APT)
Advanced persistent threat (APT) is a sophisticated and targeted unauthorized access method.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a case study, a hacker accessed a company's database without permission and altered records. Which section of the IT Act, 2000 would most likely apply?
A · Section 43(c)
Section 43(c) deals with unauthorized alteration or deletion of information in a computer system.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a reported case, an individual impersonated another person online to commit fraud. Which section of the IT Act, 2000 is relevant?
A · Section 66D
Section 66D deals with cheating by personation using computer resources, such as impersonation.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A hacker accessed a government server and caused disruption. Which of the following penalties is most applicable under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both under Section 66
Unauthorized access causing disruption to government servers is punishable under Section 66 with imprisonment or fine or both.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best defines 'Unauthorized Access' under the Information Technology Act, 2000?
B · Accessing a computer system or network without permission
Unauthorized Access refers to accessing a computer system or network without the permission of the owner or authorized person, which is prohibited under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Unauthorized access under the IT Act, 2000 primarily involves which of the following actions?
B · Accessing computer resources without permission
Unauthorized access means accessing computer resources or data without authorization, which is an offense under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements accurately describes unauthorized access in the context of cybersecurity law?
B · It involves bypassing security mechanisms to gain access
Unauthorized access involves bypassing security controls or gaining access without permission, which is illegal under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which section primarily deals with unauthorized access to protected computer systems?
A · Section 43
Section 43 of the IT Act 2000 deals with penalties and compensation for damage to computer systems caused by unauthorized access or similar activities.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 prescribes punishment for hacking, which includes unauthorized access with intent to cause damage?
B · Section 66
Section 66 of the IT Act 2000 deals with hacking and prescribes punishment for unauthorized access with intent to cause damage or disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a legal provision related to unauthorized access under the IT Act 2000?
D · Section 120 - Cyber terrorism
Section 120 does not exist in the IT Act 2000; cyber terrorism is covered under Section 66F, not Section 120.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 specifically addresses unauthorized access without permission to protected systems and the resulting damage or data alteration?
A · Section 43
Section 43 deals with unauthorized access to protected systems and penalties for damage, deletion, or alteration of data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Section 66 of the IT Act 2000 prescribes punishment for which of the following acts?
B · Hacking with intent to cause damage
Section 66 addresses hacking, which includes unauthorized access with intent to cause damage or disruption to computer systems.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section provides for imprisonment up to three years or fine up to five lakh rupees for hacking under the IT Act 2000?
B · Section 66
Section 66 prescribes punishment for hacking, including imprisonment up to three years or fine up to five lakh rupees or both.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a common mode of unauthorized access under the IT Act 2000?
B · Phishing to obtain passwords
Phishing is a mode of unauthorized access where attackers trick users into revealing credentials to gain unauthorized entry.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which type of unauthorized access involves exploiting software vulnerabilities to gain entry without permission?
C · Exploitation of software bugs
Exploitation of software bugs or vulnerabilities is a mode of unauthorized access where attackers use system flaws to gain access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of unauthorized access via social engineering?
B · Sending a fake email to trick a user into revealing credentials
Social engineering involves manipulating people into divulging confidential information, such as through phishing emails.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which mode of unauthorized access involves systematically trying all possible password combinations to gain entry?
B · Brute force attack
A brute force attack involves trying all possible passwords until the correct one is found, constituting unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the minimum punishment prescribed under Section 43 of the IT Act 2000 for unauthorized access causing damage to a computer system?
C · Compensation to the affected party
Section 43 provides for compensation to the affected party for damage caused by unauthorized access, but does not prescribe imprisonment.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under Section 66 of the IT Act 2000, what is the maximum imprisonment term for hacking with intent to cause damage?
B · 3 years
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to five lakh rupees or both for hacking with intent to cause damage.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following penalties can be imposed under the IT Act 2000 for unauthorized access leading to data theft?
C · Both fine and imprisonment
The IT Act 2000 allows for both fine and imprisonment depending on the severity of unauthorized access and damage caused.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a possible punishment under the IT Act 2000 for unauthorized access resulting in data alteration?
C · Both imprisonment and fine
Unauthorized access causing data alteration can attract both imprisonment and fine under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best distinguishes authorized access from unauthorized access?
A · Authorized access is always legal; unauthorized access is illegal
Authorized access is permitted by the owner or authorized person and is legal, whereas unauthorized access is without permission and illegal.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which scenario describes authorized access rather than unauthorized access?
A · An employee logging into the company system with valid credentials
An employee using valid credentials with permission is authorized access; other options describe unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of unauthorized access under the IT Act 2000?
C · Access with consent of the owner
Access with consent is authorized access, not unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a case where an employee accesses confidential data beyond their authorization, what type of access is this considered under the IT Act 2000?
B · Unauthorized access
Accessing data beyond granted rights is unauthorized access, even if the person is an employee.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In which of the following scenarios would the IT Act 2000 consider the access unauthorized?
C · A user accesses a system after hacking the password
Access after hacking a password is unauthorized access under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a case where a hacker accesses a government database without permission and alters data, which section of the IT Act 2000 is most likely applicable?
B · Section 66
Section 66 deals with hacking and unauthorized access with intent to cause damage, applicable in this scenario.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
An employee accesses confidential data without authorization but claims it was for company benefit. Under the IT Act 2000, which defense might be considered?
C · Exception for public interest
The Act provides exceptions for acts done in public interest, which may be a defense if proven.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following case scenarios would NOT be considered unauthorized access under the IT Act 2000?
B · An employee using their login credentials to access company data
An employee using their own credentials with permission is authorized access, not unauthorized.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a case where a person accesses a computer system without permission but claims ignorance of the law, what is the likely legal outcome under the IT Act 2000?
B · Punishment as per relevant sections
Ignorance of law is not a defense; punishment applies as per the IT Act provisions.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a valid defense under the IT Act 2000 against charges of unauthorized access?
A · Access done with prior consent
Access with prior consent or authorization is a valid defense against unauthorized access charges.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which exception may protect a person who accesses a computer system without permission but does so to prevent a greater harm?
A · Public interest exception
The Act provides exceptions for acts done in public interest or to prevent greater harm.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT an exception under the IT Act 2000 for unauthorized access charges?
C · Access for personal curiosity without permission
Access for personal curiosity without permission is not an exception and is punishable.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the Information Technology Act 2000, how is 'Hacking' primarily defined?
A · Unauthorized access to a computer system or network
Hacking under the IT Act 2000 is defined as unauthorized access to a computer system or network, which is illegal.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes hacking as per the IT Act 2000?
B · Accessing a computer system without permission
Hacking involves accessing a computer system without permission, which is prohibited under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 defines the offence of hacking?
B · Section 66
Section 66 of the IT Act 2000 specifically deals with the offence of hacking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT included in the definition of hacking under the IT Act 2000?
C · Authorized system maintenance
Authorized system maintenance is a legitimate activity and not considered hacking under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Section 66 of the IT Act 2000 deals with which of the following offences?
B · Hacking
Section 66 specifically addresses the offence of hacking, including unauthorized access to computer systems.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the maximum imprisonment term prescribed under Section 66 of the IT Act 2000 for hacking?
A · 3 years
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or a fine or both for hacking offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following actions is punishable under Section 66 of the IT Act 2000?
B · Accessing a protected computer system without permission
Unauthorized access to a protected computer system is punishable under Section 66.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under Section 66 of the IT Act 2000, which of the following is a valid defense against hacking charges?
A · Access was authorized by the system owner
Authorization by the system owner negates the offence of hacking under Section 66.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a recognized type of hacking under the IT Act 2000?
C · Authorized data entry
Authorized data entry is a legitimate activity and not considered hacking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which type of hacking involves overwhelming a system to make it unavailable to users?
B · Denial of Service (DoS) attack
Denial of Service (DoS) attack floods a system with traffic to disrupt its availability.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following hacking types involves deceiving users to obtain confidential information?
A · Phishing
Phishing involves tricking users into revealing sensitive information.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which hacking method involves systematically trying all possible passwords to gain access?
B · Brute force attack
Brute force attack tries all possible password combinations to break into a system.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following hacking types is considered the most sophisticated and difficult to detect under the IT Act 2000?
C · Advanced Persistent Threat (APT)
Advanced Persistent Threats (APT) are sophisticated, targeted hacking attempts that are hard to detect.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the minimum punishment for hacking under the IT Act 2000, Section 66?
B · Imprisonment up to 3 years
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both for hacking offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following penalties can be imposed for hacking under the IT Act 2000?
C · Imprisonment or fine or both
The law provides for imprisonment or fine or both as punishment for hacking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If a person hacks a computer system causing damage to data, what is the maximum fine that can be imposed under the IT Act 2000?
B · Up to Rs. 5 lakh
The IT Act 2000 allows fines up to Rs. 5 lakh for hacking causing damage to data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following distinguishes hacking from other computer offences under the IT Act 2000?
A · Hacking involves unauthorized access, other offences may involve data theft
Hacking specifically refers to unauthorized access, whereas other offences may involve different illegal acts like data theft.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a key factor that differentiates hacking from unauthorized data alteration under the IT Act 2000?
A · Hacking requires intent to access without permission
Intent to access without permission is central to hacking, while data alteration may or may not involve unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which statement best distinguishes hacking from identity theft under the IT Act 2000?
A · Hacking is unauthorized access; identity theft involves misuse of personal information
Hacking involves unauthorized access to systems, while identity theft involves misuse of personal data, which may or may not involve hacking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the role of intent in the offence of hacking under the IT Act 2000?
B · Intent to cause damage or gain unauthorized access is necessary
The offence of hacking requires intent to gain unauthorized access or cause damage to the system.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following scenarios demonstrates authorized hacking under the IT Act 2000?
A · A security expert testing a system with permission
Authorized hacking, such as penetration testing by a security expert with permission, is legal under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is true regarding authorization in hacking offences under the IT Act 2000?
A · Authorization by the owner exempts the act from being hacking
If the system owner authorizes access, the act does not constitute hacking under the law.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following case scenarios is an example of hacking under the IT Act 2000?
A · A person accessing a computer system without permission to steal data
Unauthorized access to steal data is a classic example of hacking under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a case where a hacker accesses a system but does not alter or damage any data, what does the IT Act 2000 prescribe?
B · Offence of hacking is still committed
Unauthorized access itself constitutes hacking under Section 66, regardless of data alteration.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following case scenarios would NOT be considered hacking under the IT Act 2000?
A · A person accessing a system with explicit permission
Access with explicit permission is not hacking; it is authorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the Information Technology Act, 2000, which of the following best defines 'Hacking'?
A · Unauthorized access to a computer system or network
Hacking is defined as unauthorized access to a computer system or network under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 specifically deals with the offence of hacking?
B · Section 66
Section 66 of the IT Act, 2000 deals specifically with the offence of hacking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT considered a type of hacking under the IT Act, 2000?
B · Ethical hacking with consent
Ethical hacking performed with consent is not considered illegal hacking under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the minimum punishment prescribed under Section 66 of the IT Act, 2000 for hacking?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to 5 lakh rupees
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to 5 lakh rupees or both for hacking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following sections deals with unauthorized access to protected systems, distinct from hacking?
D · Section 65
Section 65 deals with tampering with computer source documents and unauthorized access to protected systems, which is distinct from hacking under Section 66.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a valid defense under the IT Act, 2000 against a charge of hacking?
A · Accessing a computer system with prior written consent
Access with prior written consent is a valid defense under the IT Act, 2000 against hacking charges.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the legal meaning of 'Hacking' under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Unauthorized intrusion into a computer system with intent to cause damage or theft
Hacking is defined as unauthorized intrusion into a computer system with intent to cause damage or theft.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 provides the punishment for identity theft often linked with hacking activities?
A · Section 66C
Section 66C deals with punishment for identity theft, which is often linked with hacking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following types of hacking involves gaining access to a system to test its security with permission?
A · White-hat hacking
White-hat hacking involves authorized access to test and improve system security.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which punishment is prescribed under Section 66F of the IT Act, 2000 for cyber terrorism, which may involve hacking?
A · Imprisonment for life or imprisonment up to 3 years and fine
Section 66F prescribes punishment for cyber terrorism, including life imprisonment or imprisonment up to 3 years with fine.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following distinguishes hacking from unauthorized access under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Hacking involves intent to cause damage, unauthorized access may not
Hacking involves unauthorized access with intent to cause damage or harm, whereas unauthorized access may be without such intent.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an exception under the IT Act, 2000 for hacking charges?
A · Accessing a system for security testing with prior authorization
Accessing a system with prior authorization for security testing is an exception under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a legally recognized type of hacking under the IT Act, 2000?
C · Script kiddie hacking
Script kiddie hacking is a colloquial term and not legally recognized under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 prescribes the highest punishment for hacking-related offences?
B · Section 66F
Section 66F deals with cyber terrorism and prescribes the highest punishment including life imprisonment.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If a person hacks a computer system causing damage exceeding one lakh rupees, what is the maximum punishment under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to 5 lakh rupees or both
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to 5 lakh rupees or both for hacking causing damage exceeding one lakh rupees.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following scenarios would NOT be considered hacking under the IT Act, 2000?
A · A security expert accessing a system with consent to identify vulnerabilities
Accessing a system with consent for security testing is not hacking under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best explains the difference between hacking and data theft under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Hacking is unauthorized access; data theft involves stealing information after access
Hacking refers to unauthorized access, whereas data theft involves stealing data after gaining access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a key exception to hacking under the IT Act, 2000 when performed by a government official?
A · Accessing a computer system in discharge of official duties
Government officials accessing computer systems in discharge of official duties are exempted from hacking charges under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following punishments can be imposed for hacking that causes damage to computer systems under Section 43 of the IT Act, 2000?
A · Compensation to the affected party and fine
Section 43 provides for compensation and fine for damage caused by hacking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is true about 'Grey-hat hacking' under the IT Act, 2000?
A · It involves unauthorized access but without malicious intent
Grey-hat hacking involves unauthorized access but typically without malicious intent, though it may still be illegal.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act, 2000, which of the following is NOT a valid defense against hacking charges?
C · Claiming ignorance of the law
Claiming ignorance of the law is not a valid defense under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the definition of System Disruption under the Information Technology Act, 2000?
B · Any act that intentionally or knowingly causes disruption or denial of access to any computer resource
System Disruption under the IT Act 2000 refers to any intentional or knowing act that disrupts or denies access to a computer resource, thereby affecting its normal functioning.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes System Disruption as per the IT Act 2000?
B · Intentional interference with the normal functioning of a computer system or network
System Disruption involves intentional acts that interfere with the normal operation of computer systems or networks, causing denial or interruption of service.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which scenario qualifies as System Disruption under the IT Act 2000?
A · A hacker installing malware to crash a government website
Installing malware to intentionally crash a website disrupts the normal functioning of a computer system, fitting the definition of System Disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a type of System Disruption offence under the IT Act 2000?
B · Data theft from a computer system
Data theft is a separate offence related to unauthorized access and data breach, not specifically classified as System Disruption which focuses on interruption or denial of service.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of a System Disruption offence involving denial of access?
B · Launching a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack on a bank's website
A DDoS attack floods a system with traffic to deny legitimate users access, which is a classic example of System Disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which type of System Disruption offence involves altering system configurations to cause malfunction?
B · System tampering
System tampering involves unauthorized changes to system settings or configurations to disrupt normal operations.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Analyze the following scenario: An attacker injects malicious code that causes a system to crash intermittently. Under the IT Act 2000, this act is classified as which type of offence?
A · System Disruption offence
Injecting malicious code that causes system crashes disrupts the normal functioning of the system, thus constituting a System Disruption offence.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 specifically deals with penalties for hacking and system disruption?
B · Section 66
Section 66 of the IT Act 2000 deals with hacking and related offences including system disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 provides for compensation for damage caused by system disruption?
A · Section 43
Section 43 provides for compensation to the affected party for damage caused by unauthorized access, damage, or disruption to computer systems.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under which section is the offence of intentionally causing damage to a computer system punishable with imprisonment up to three years or fine up to five lakh rupees?
B · Section 66
Section 66 prescribes punishment for hacking and intentionally causing damage to computer systems, including imprisonment and fines.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section empowers the government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt information in the interest of system security and prevention of system disruption?
A · Section 69
Section 69 empowers the government to take necessary actions including interception and monitoring to prevent system disruption and maintain security.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Analyze the applicability of Section 66F in a case where a hacker disrupts a critical infrastructure system. What is the significance of this section?
A · It deals with hacking offences related to national security and cyber terrorism
Section 66F is the cyber terrorism section, applicable when system disruption affects national security or critical infrastructure.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the minimum punishment prescribed under the IT Act 2000 for causing system disruption through hacking?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to 5 lakh rupees
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to 5 lakh rupees or both for hacking causing system disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following penalties may be imposed for causing damage to a computer system resulting in system disruption under the IT Act 2000?
A · Imprisonment, fine, or both
The Act allows for imprisonment, fine, or both depending on the severity of the system disruption caused.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A person is found guilty of causing system disruption by introducing a virus that damages critical data. What is the highest punishment that can be imposed under the IT Act 2000?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to 5 lakh rupees
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to 5 lakh rupees for offences causing system disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Evaluate the punishment under the IT Act 2000 for a repeat offender causing system disruption through hacking.
B · Imprisonment up to 5 years and fine
Repeat offences may attract enhanced punishment, including imprisonment up to 5 years and fine, depending on judicial discretion.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which authority is primarily responsible for enforcing legal procedures related to system disruption offences under the IT Act 2000?
B · Police and Cyber Crime Cells
Police and specialized Cyber Crime Cells are responsible for investigation and enforcement of offences under the IT Act, including system disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which legal procedure is followed when a system disruption offence is detected under the IT Act 2000?
A · Filing a First Information Report (FIR) and investigation by cyber police
The procedure involves filing an FIR followed by investigation by cyber crime authorities before prosecution.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Analyze the enforcement challenges faced by authorities in prosecuting system disruption offences under the IT Act 2000.
A · Difficulty in tracing offenders due to anonymity and jurisdiction issues
Enforcement is challenged by anonymity of offenders, cross-border jurisdiction, and technical complexities in evidence collection.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following distinguishes System Disruption from Data Theft under the IT Act 2000?
A · System Disruption involves denial of service; Data Theft involves unauthorized copying of data
System Disruption focuses on interrupting system functionality, while Data Theft involves unauthorized acquisition or copying of data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
How can System Disruption be legally differentiated from Identity Theft under the IT Act 2000?
A · System Disruption affects system availability; Identity Theft involves misuse of personal information
System Disruption targets system functionality, whereas Identity Theft involves stealing and misusing personal identity information.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Evaluate the key difference between System Disruption and Cyber Terrorism under the IT Act 2000.
A · Cyber Terrorism involves system disruption with intent to threaten national security; System Disruption may not
Cyber Terrorism is a specialized offence involving system disruption with intent to threaten national security or public safety, whereas System Disruption may be for other motives.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a case where a hacker causes a bank's online system to crash temporarily, which section of the IT Act 2000 is most relevant for prosecution?
A · Section 66
Section 66 deals with hacking and causing damage to computer systems, including temporary crashes and system disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider a scenario where a virus introduced into a government system causes denial of service. Which legal provision applies and what is the likely punishment?
B · Section 66; imprisonment up to 3 years or fine
Section 66 applies to hacking and system disruption with punishment of imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Analyze the legal implications when a cyber attacker disrupts a hospital's computer system causing delay in emergency services. Which sections and punishments are applicable?
A · Section 66 and Section 66F; imprisonment up to 10 years and fine
Disrupting critical infrastructure like hospitals may invoke Section 66 for hacking and Section 66F for cyber terrorism, with severe punishments.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Evaluate the differences in legal consequences between accidental system failure and intentional system disruption under the IT Act 2000.
A · Intentional disruption attracts criminal penalties; accidental failure does not
The IT Act penalizes intentional acts causing system disruption, whereas accidental failures are generally not criminalized.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the Information Technology Act 2000, how is 'System Disruption' primarily defined?
B · Intentional hindrance or interruption of a computer system's normal functioning
System Disruption refers to intentional acts that hinder or interrupt the normal functioning of a computer system, as per the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the scope of system disruption under the IT Act 2000?
C · Any act causing interruption or damage to computer resources or networks
The scope includes any act that causes interruption or damage to computer resources or networks, not limited to malware or hacking alone.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following scenarios falls within the scope of system disruption under the IT Act 2000?
C · Launching a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack to crash a website
Launching a DDoS attack disrupts the normal functioning of a system, which is a classic example of system disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a type of system disruption offence under the IT Act 2000?
B · Unauthorized access to steal data
Unauthorized access to steal data is primarily data theft or hacking, not system disruption which focuses on interruption or damage.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following offences would be classified as system disruption rather than data theft under the IT Act 2000?
B · Injecting malware to crash a server
Injecting malware to crash a server disrupts system functionality, fitting the system disruption offence category.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a complex example of system disruption under the IT Act 2000?
B · Altering source code to cause intermittent system failures
Altering source code to cause intermittent failures is a sophisticated form of system disruption affecting system reliability.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 specifically addresses penalties for damage to computer systems causing disruption?
A · Section 43
Section 43 deals with penalties for unauthorized damage to computer systems, including system disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Section 66F of the IT Act 2000 is related to which of the following offences?
A · Cyber terrorism causing system disruption
Section 66F deals with cyber terrorism, which includes acts causing system disruption to threaten security.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 provides for punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service causing system disruption?
A · Section 66A
Section 66A penalizes sending offensive messages through communication service which can cause disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 prescribes the highest punishment for system disruption offences involving cyber terrorism?
B · Section 66F
Section 66F deals with cyber terrorism and prescribes the highest punishment including imprisonment for system disruption offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the maximum penalty prescribed under Section 43 of the IT Act 2000 for causing damage to a computer system resulting in system disruption?
C · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both
Section 43 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both for causing damage leading to system disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following punishments is applicable under Section 66F for cyber terrorism causing system disruption?
B · Imprisonment for life or death penalty
Section 66F provides for imprisonment for life or even death penalty for cyber terrorism involving system disruption.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which punishment is prescribed for intentionally disrupting a computer system without causing damage under Section 66?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both for intentional disruption without damage.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best distinguishes system disruption from hacking under the IT Act 2000?
B · System disruption focuses on interrupting system functionality; hacking focuses on unauthorized access
System disruption targets interruption of system functioning, while hacking primarily involves unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which offence is primarily related to data theft rather than system disruption under the IT Act 2000?
B · Unauthorized copying of confidential files
Unauthorized copying of files is data theft, not system disruption which involves interruption or damage.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best explains the difference between system disruption and hacking under IT Act 2000 in terms of legal consequences?
C · System disruption focuses on damage/interruption; hacking focuses on unauthorized access and data breach
System disruption involves damage or interruption, while hacking involves unauthorized access and data breach, with different legal implications.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a hard-level question distinguishing system disruption from related offences?
B · System disruption targets system availability; hacking targets confidentiality and integrity
System disruption primarily affects system availability, while hacking targets confidentiality and integrity of data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a key evidentiary requirement to prove system disruption under the IT Act 2000?
B · Evidence of intentional hindrance to system functioning
To prove system disruption, evidence must show intentional interference with system functioning.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which legal procedure is essential for collecting digital evidence in system disruption cases under the IT Act 2000?
A · Obtaining a search warrant before seizure of electronic devices
Legal procedures require obtaining a search warrant to lawfully collect digital evidence ensuring admissibility in court.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a challenging aspect in proving system disruption offences legally under the IT Act 2000?
A · Establishing the intent to disrupt system functioning
Proving the offender's intent to disrupt the system is often complex and critical in legal proceedings.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a real-world case where a hacker launched a DDoS attack on a bank's website causing system disruption, which section of the IT Act 2000 is most applicable?
B · Section 66
Section 66 deals with computer-related offences including intentional disruption such as DDoS attacks.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a case where a virus was introduced to disrupt a hospital's computer system, which punishment is likely to be imposed under the IT Act 2000?
B · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both
Introducing a virus causing disruption is punishable with imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both under Section 43 or 66.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A company suffered system disruption due to tampering with source code causing intermittent failures. Which aspect is crucial to prove in court under the IT Act 2000?
A · Intentional act to disrupt system functioning
Proving the intentional act to disrupt system functioning is essential to establish system disruption offence.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the most accurate definition of password cracking?
B · An unauthorized attempt to discover or bypass passwords to gain access
Password cracking refers to the unauthorized attempt to discover or bypass passwords to gain access to protected systems or data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the nature of password cracking?
B · It is an illegal activity aimed at unauthorized access
Password cracking is generally an illegal activity aimed at gaining unauthorized access to computer systems or data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements best explains the nature of password cracking in the context of computer offences?
B · It is a cybercrime involving unauthorized access to protected information
Password cracking is considered a cybercrime as it involves unauthorized access to protected information, which is punishable under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a common method of password cracking?
B · Phishing attack
Phishing is a social engineering attack to steal credentials, not a direct password cracking method which involves computational techniques.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which password cracking method uses precomputed hash values to speed up the cracking process?
B · Rainbow table attack
Rainbow table attacks use precomputed tables of hash values to reverse cryptographic hash functions faster than brute force.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a brute force password cracking attack, what is the primary factor that determines the time taken to crack a password?
A · Length and complexity of the password
The time taken to crack a password using brute force depends mainly on the password's length and complexity, as more combinations need to be tried.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following advanced password cracking techniques involves exploiting vulnerabilities in password storage mechanisms?
B · Rainbow table attack
Rainbow table attacks exploit weaknesses in password hashing and storage by using precomputed hash tables to reverse hashes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under which section of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is password cracking primarily addressed?
B · Section 66
Section 66 of the IT Act deals with computer-related offences including hacking and unauthorized access, which covers password cracking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements correctly describes the legal provision related to password cracking under the IT Act, 2000?
B · Unauthorized password cracking is punishable under Section 66 of the IT Act
Unauthorized password cracking is punishable under Section 66 of the IT Act, which deals with hacking and unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the Information Technology Act, 2000 prescribes punishment for hacking including password cracking with imprisonment up to three years or fine up to one lakh rupees or both?
B · Section 66
Section 66 of the IT Act prescribes punishment for hacking, which includes password cracking, with imprisonment and/or fine.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the maximum punishment prescribed under the IT Act, 2000 for password cracking offences under Section 66?
B · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to 1 lakh rupees or both
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to 1 lakh rupees or both for hacking offences including password cracking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following penalties can be imposed for password cracking under the IT Act, 2000 besides imprisonment?
B · Monetary fine
Besides imprisonment, the IT Act prescribes monetary fines as penalties for password cracking offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements correctly describes the punishment for password cracking under the IT Act, 2000 when it causes damage to computer resources?
B · Punishment can include imprisonment, fine, or both depending on severity
The IT Act allows for imprisonment, fine, or both depending on the severity of the offence including damage caused by password cracking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best distinguishes password cracking from hacking under the IT Act, 2000?
B · Password cracking specifically targets passwords, hacking is a broader unauthorized access
Password cracking specifically targets obtaining passwords, while hacking refers to any unauthorized access or intrusion into computer systems.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
How does password cracking differ from identity theft under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Password cracking involves unauthorized access, identity theft involves impersonation
Password cracking is unauthorized access to systems, while identity theft involves impersonating another person to commit fraud.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a key difference between password cracking and phishing attacks?
A · Password cracking uses technical methods, phishing relies on social engineering
Password cracking uses technical methods to break passwords, whereas phishing uses social engineering to trick users into revealing credentials.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an effective preventive measure against password cracking?
B · Implementing multi-factor authentication
Multi-factor authentication adds an extra layer of security, making password cracking less effective.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which cybersecurity practice helps mitigate risks associated with password cracking?
A · Regularly updating software and patches
Regular software updates and patches fix vulnerabilities that could be exploited in password cracking attempts.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best explains the cybersecurity implication of password cracking?
A · It leads to unauthorized data access and potential data breaches
Password cracking can lead to unauthorized data access and compromise system security, causing data breaches.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best defines password cracking?
A · Unauthorized attempt to discover or bypass a password
Password cracking involves unauthorized attempts to discover or bypass passwords to gain access to protected systems or data.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Password cracking is primarily considered a ____ offence under the IT Act 2000.
B · Criminal
Password cracking is treated as a criminal offence under the IT Act 2000, punishable by law.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements accurately describes the nature of password cracking?
B · It involves guessing or computing passwords without authorization.
Password cracking involves unauthorized guessing or computing of passwords to gain illicit access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a common method used in password cracking?
B · Phishing attack
Phishing is a social engineering attack, not a direct password cracking technique.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a brute force attack, the attacker attempts to crack a password by:
A · Trying all possible combinations until the correct one is found
Brute force attacks systematically try every possible password combination until the correct one is found.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which technique uses a pre-arranged list of possible passwords and their hash values to speed up password cracking?
A · Rainbow table attack
Rainbow table attacks use precomputed tables of hashes to quickly reverse hashed passwords.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following password cracking methods is considered the most time-consuming but guaranteed to succeed eventually?
A · Brute force attack
Brute force attacks try every possible combination, guaranteeing success but often taking a long time.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under which section of the IT Act 2000 is unauthorized access to protected systems by password cracking primarily addressed?
B · Section 66
Section 66 deals with computer-related offences including unauthorized access, which covers password cracking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 specifically penalizes tampering with computer source documents, which may include password cracking activities?
A · Section 65
Section 65 penalizes tampering with computer source documents, which can relate to password cracking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is TRUE about legal provisions related to password cracking under the IT Act 2000?
A · Password cracking is not explicitly mentioned but covered under unauthorized access provisions
The IT Act 2000 covers password cracking under unauthorized access and related offences, though it may not be explicitly named.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
According to the IT Act 2000, which of the following penalties can be imposed for password cracking offences?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to 5 lakh rupees
The IT Act 2000 prescribes imprisonment and fines for offences like password cracking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 prescribes punishment for identity theft, which may be related to password cracking activities?
A · Section 66C
Section 66C deals with identity theft, which can be a consequence of password cracking.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a possible punishment under the IT Act 2000 for someone convicted of password cracking?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine
The IT Act 2000 prescribes imprisonment and fines for password cracking offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
How does password cracking differ from hacking under the IT Act 2000?
A · Password cracking specifically targets passwords, while hacking may involve broader unauthorized access
Password cracking is a subset of hacking focused on obtaining passwords, whereas hacking includes all forms of unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following distinguishes password cracking from phishing attacks?
A · Password cracking uses technical methods to guess passwords; phishing uses deception to obtain them
Password cracking involves technical attempts to guess passwords, while phishing relies on tricking users to reveal passwords.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a key difference between password cracking and malware attacks?
B · Malware requires physical access, password cracking does not
Malware attacks do not necessarily require physical access; they can be delivered remotely, so this is not a distinguishing factor.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a recommended preventive measure against password cracking?
A · Using multi-factor authentication
Multi-factor authentication adds an extra layer of security, making password cracking more difficult.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which security practice helps reduce the risk of password cracking by limiting login attempts?
A · Account lockout after multiple failed attempts
Account lockout policies prevent attackers from repeatedly trying passwords, reducing brute force attack risks.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an effective method to protect against rainbow table attacks?
A · Salting passwords before hashing
Salting adds random data to passwords before hashing, making rainbow table attacks ineffective.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Assertion (A): Using a longer salt length always guarantees protection against rainbow table attacks.
Reason (R): Rainbow tables grow exponentially with password length but linearly with salt length.
C · A is false, but R is true
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the correct definition of an 'Access Code' under the Information Technology Act, 2000?
A · A password, PIN, or any other code used to gain access to a computer system or network
Under the IT Act, 2000, an access code means any password, PIN, or other security code used to gain access to a computer system or network.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the purpose of an access code?
A · To restrict unauthorized access to computer resources
Access codes are primarily used to restrict unauthorized access to computer systems and protect data integrity.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT considered a type of access code under the IT Act, 2000?
D · Physical key to a computer room
Access codes refer to digital or electronic codes like passwords, PINs, biometric data, or encryption keys. A physical key to a room is not an access code under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a type of access code that uses unique biological traits for authentication?
B · Biometric code
Biometric codes use unique biological traits such as fingerprints or retina scans for authentication.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of a cryptographic access code?
C · Encryption key
Encryption keys are cryptographic access codes used to secure data by encoding it.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under which section of the IT Act, 2000 is the unauthorized use of access codes addressed?
A · Section 43
Section 43 of the IT Act, 2000 deals with penalties for unauthorized access to computer systems, including misuse of access codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 prescribes punishment for hacking using access codes?
A · Section 66
Section 66 of the IT Act, 2000 prescribes punishment for hacking, which includes unauthorized access using access codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which provision under the IT Act, 2000 allows the government to intercept or monitor access codes in certain circumstances?
A · Section 69
Section 69 empowers the government to intercept, monitor or decrypt any information including access codes for security purposes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements about Section 66C of the IT Act, 2000 is correct?
A · It deals with identity theft using access codes
Section 66C specifically addresses identity theft, which often involves misuse of access codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following constitutes an offence involving access codes under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Using someone else's password without permission
Unauthorized use of someone else's access code is an offence under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following acts is considered unauthorized access under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Accessing a computer system using stolen access codes
Accessing a computer system using stolen or unauthorized access codes is an offence under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of an offence involving access codes under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Hacking into a system using someone else's password
Hacking using unauthorized access codes is a punishable offence under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following scenarios would be considered a hard-level offence involving access codes under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Using an access code obtained by deception to access confidential information
Using access codes obtained by deception to gain unauthorized access to confidential information is a serious offence under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the minimum punishment prescribed under Section 66 of the IT Act, 2000 for hacking using access codes?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to one lakh rupees
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to one lakh rupees for hacking offences involving access codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following penalties can be imposed for unauthorized access using access codes under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Imprisonment, fine, or both
The IT Act provides for imprisonment, fine, or both for unauthorized access using access codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act, 2000, what is the maximum fine that can be imposed for identity theft involving access codes under Section 66C?
A · Two lakh rupees
Section 66C prescribes imprisonment up to three years and/or fine up to two lakh rupees for identity theft involving access codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a valid defense under the IT Act, 2000 against charges of unauthorized access using access codes?
A · Access was authorized by the owner or by law
Authorized access by the owner or under lawful authority is a valid defense under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT considered a defense under the IT Act, 2000 for unauthorized access using access codes?
D · Access done to commit fraud
Access done to commit fraud is not a valid defense and is punishable under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best explains the exception clause related to access codes under the IT Act, 2000?
A · Access with prior consent or legal authorization is not an offence
The Act provides exceptions where access is authorized by the owner or by law, making such access lawful.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a case study where an employee used a colleague's access code without permission to alter data, which offence under the IT Act, 2000 is most applicable?
A · Unauthorized access and data alteration under Section 43
Using someone else's access code without permission to alter data constitutes unauthorized access and data tampering under Section 43.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a reported case, a hacker used stolen access codes to steal confidential information. Which sections of the IT Act, 2000 would be invoked?
A · Sections 43 and 66
Sections 43 and 66 deal with unauthorized access and hacking using access codes respectively.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a hard-level case, an individual bypassed biometric access controls using fake fingerprints. Which offence and penalty under the IT Act, 2000 would apply?
A · Hacking under Section 66 with imprisonment up to 3 years and fine
Bypassing biometric access controls is hacking under Section 66, punishable with imprisonment and fine.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best defines an 'Access Code' under the Information Technology Act, 2000?
A · A password or any other unique identification used to access a computer resource
Under the IT Act, 2000, an 'Access Code' refers to any password, PIN, or other unique identification used to gain access to a computer resource.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT considered an Access Code under the IT Act, 2000?
D · Physical hardware device like a USB drive
Access Code refers to passwords, PINs, or other unique identifiers, including biometric data and encryption keys, but not physical hardware devices themselves.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
How does the IT Act, 2000 legally recognize the importance of Access Codes in computer security?
B · By criminalizing unauthorized use or disclosure of Access Codes
The IT Act, 2000 treats Access Codes as sensitive information and penalizes unauthorized use or disclosure to protect computer resources.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 specifically deals with punishment for dishonestly using someone else's Access Code?
C · Section 66C
Section 66C of the IT Act, 2000 deals with punishment for identity theft, including dishonest use of someone else's Access Code.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes 'Unauthorized Access' under the IT Act, 2000 in relation to Access Codes?
B · Accessing a computer resource without permission using valid or invalid Access Codes
Unauthorized access means accessing a computer resource without permission, often by using Access Codes that are either stolen or guessed.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 addresses punishment for hacking that involves tampering with Access Codes?
A · Section 66
Section 66 of the IT Act, 2000 deals with hacking, which includes tampering with Access Codes to gain unauthorized access.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following actions constitutes an offence under Section 66D of the IT Act, 2000 concerning Access Codes?
C · Cheating by personation using a computer resource
Section 66D penalizes cheating by personation using a computer resource, which often involves misuse of Access Codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 prescribes punishment for identity theft involving Access Codes?
A · Section 66C
Section 66C specifically deals with identity theft, including the dishonest use of someone else's Access Code.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under which section of the IT Act, 2000 is the punishment for hacking with computer systems, including misuse of Access Codes, prescribed?
B · Section 66
Section 66 prescribes punishment for hacking, which includes unauthorized use or tampering of Access Codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following sections of the IT Act, 2000 is NOT directly related to offences involving Access Codes?
D · Section 75
Section 75 deals with offences by companies and is not directly related to Access Code offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 provides for penalties related to unauthorized access to protected systems using Access Codes?
A · Section 43
Section 43 deals with penalties for unauthorized access to protected systems, including misuse of Access Codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the maximum imprisonment term prescribed under Section 66C of the IT Act, 2000 for identity theft involving Access Codes?
A · 3 years
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following punishments can be imposed under Section 66D of the IT Act, 2000 for cheating by personation using Access Codes?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to one lakh rupees
Section 66D prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to one lakh rupees for cheating by personation using Access Codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which punishment is prescribed under Section 66 for hacking involving Access Codes under the IT Act, 2000?
B · Imprisonment up to 5 years or fine or both
Section 66 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both. However, amendments have increased imprisonment up to 5 years for hacking offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a valid defense under the IT Act, 2000 against charges of unauthorized use of Access Codes?
A · Access was obtained with the consent of the owner
Consent of the owner is a valid defense against unauthorized access charges under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act, 2000, which of the following scenarios may NOT be considered an offence related to Access Codes due to exceptions provided in the Act?
A · Accessing a computer system with the owner’s permission
Access with the owner’s permission is an exception and not an offence under the IT Act, 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a recognized defense under the IT Act, 2000 for an accused charged with misuse of Access Codes?
A · The accused was authorized by law to access the computer resource
Authorization by law is a valid defense under the IT Act, 2000 against charges of misuse of Access Codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a landmark case involving misuse of Access Codes, the court held that unauthorized access must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. This principle is an example of which concept under the IT Act, 2000?
B · Exceptions and defenses under the Act
The requirement to prove unauthorized access beyond reasonable doubt relates to exceptions and defenses under the Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following cases would most likely be prosecuted under Section 66D of the IT Act, 2000 involving Access Codes?
A · Using someone else’s Access Code to impersonate them and cheat
Section 66D deals with cheating by personation using a computer resource, often involving misuse of Access Codes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a complex cybercrime case, an accused argued that the Access Code was obtained accidentally and no harm was done. Which aspect of the IT Act, 2000 is being tested here?
C · Exceptions and defenses under the Act
The argument relates to exceptions and defenses under the Act, where intent and harm are considered.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the Information Technology Act 2000, how is 'Criminal Liability' primarily defined?
B · Liability imposed for commission of offences punishable under the IT Act
Criminal liability under the IT Act 2000 refers to the legal responsibility for offences punishable under the Act, involving commission of computer-related crimes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
B · Legal accountability for offences involving computer resources
Criminal liability under the IT Act 2000 involves legal accountability for offences committed using computer resources, distinct from civil liabilities.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following elements is essential to establish criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
B · Proof of mens rea or intent to commit offence
Mens rea, or the guilty mind/intent, is a fundamental element to establish criminal liability under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a type of computer offence attracting criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
C · Breach of contract for software purchase
Breach of contract is a civil matter and does not attract criminal liability under the IT Act 2000, unlike hacking, identity theft, or publishing obscene material.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following offences is covered under the IT Act 2000 as a criminal offence?
A · Unauthorized access to protected computer systems
Unauthorized access (hacking) to protected computer systems is a criminal offence under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following computer offences under the IT Act 2000 involves fraudulent use of electronic signatures or passwords?
A · Section 66C - Identity Theft
Section 66C deals with identity theft, which includes fraudulent use of electronic signatures or passwords.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following offences under the IT Act 2000 is considered the most serious and involves acts threatening the sovereignty and integrity of India using computer resources?
B · Section 66F - Cyber Terrorism
Section 66F deals with cyber terrorism, which involves serious offences threatening national security using computer resources.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 deals with tampering with computer source documents and attracting criminal liability?
A · Section 65
Section 65 specifically deals with tampering with computer source documents and prescribes punishment for it.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Section 66D of the IT Act 2000 pertains to which of the following offences?
B · Cheating by personation using computer resources
Section 66D deals with cheating by personation by using computer resources.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 prescribes punishment for violation of privacy by capturing images or videos without consent?
A · Section 66E
Section 66E deals with violation of privacy, including capturing images of private areas without consent.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following sections prescribes the highest punishment under the IT Act 2000 for cyber terrorism offences?
B · Section 66F
Section 66F prescribes the highest punishment, including imprisonment for life, for cyber terrorism offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 deals with hacking and provides punishment for it?
B · Section 66
Section 66 deals with computer-related offences including hacking and prescribes punishment.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under Section 66C of the IT Act 2000, what is the maximum punishment for identity theft?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to Rs. 1 lakh
Section 66C prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to Rs. 1 lakh for identity theft.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the punishment prescribed under Section 66E of the IT Act 2000 for violation of privacy?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to Rs. 2 lakh or both
Section 66E prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to Rs. 2 lakh or both for violation of privacy.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following punishments is prescribed under Section 65 of the IT Act 2000 for tampering with computer source documents?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to Rs. 2 lakh or both
Section 65 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to Rs. 2 lakh or both for tampering with computer source documents.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the maximum punishment under Section 66F for cyber terrorism under the IT Act 2000?
C · Imprisonment for life
Section 66F prescribes imprisonment for life for cyber terrorism offences.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a procedural requirement before prosecution under the IT Act 2000 for certain offences?
A · Prior approval of the Central Government
Certain offences under the IT Act 2000 require prior approval of the Central Government before prosecution.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which authority is primarily responsible for investigating offences under the IT Act 2000?
A · Police officers not below the rank of Inspector
Investigations under the IT Act 2000 are generally conducted by police officers not below the rank of Inspector.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is true regarding the procedure for prosecution under the IT Act 2000?
C · Certain offences require prior sanction from the Central Government
Certain offences under the IT Act 2000 require prior sanction or approval from the Central Government before prosecution.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following procedural aspects is considered 'hard' level under prosecution in IT Act 2000?
B · Requirement of prior approval for prosecution of certain offences
The requirement of prior approval for prosecution of certain offences is a complex procedural aspect under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best distinguishes criminal liability from civil liability under the IT Act 2000?
B · Criminal liability requires proof beyond reasonable doubt; civil liability requires preponderance of evidence
Criminal liability requires proof beyond reasonable doubt, whereas civil liability requires proof on the balance or preponderance of probabilities.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a key difference between civil and criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
B · Criminal liability involves punishment like imprisonment; civil liability involves compensation
Criminal liability typically involves punishment such as imprisonment or fine, whereas civil liability involves compensation or damages.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements is true regarding civil and criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
B · Criminal liability is enforced by the state; civil liability is enforced by private parties
Criminal liability is enforced by the state through prosecution, whereas civil liability is enforced by private parties through civil suits.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In the context of criminal liability under the IT Act 2000, what role does 'mens rea' play?
C · It denotes the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing
Mens rea refers to the mental element or intention to commit a crime, which is crucial in establishing criminal liability.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes the importance of intent (mens rea) in criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
B · Intent is necessary to prove commission of certain offences
Intent or mens rea is necessary to prove the commission of many offences under the IT Act 2000 to establish criminal liability.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following scenarios would NOT establish criminal liability under the IT Act 2000 due to lack of mens rea?
A · A person unknowingly clicks on a malicious link causing damage
Accidental or unintentional acts without mens rea generally do not establish criminal liability under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a recognized defense under the criminal liability provisions of the IT Act 2000?
C · Accidental commission without intent
Accidental commission without intent (lack of mens rea) can be a defense; ignorance of law is generally not a defense.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which of the following exceptions may be used as a defense against criminal liability?
D · Both A and C
Consent of the owner and accidental damage without intention are valid defenses; ignorance of law is not.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT considered a valid defense under the criminal liability provisions of the IT Act 2000?
C · Ignorance of the law
Ignorance of the law is generally not a valid defense under the IT Act 2000 or any criminal law.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best defines 'Criminal Liability' under the Information Technology Act, 2000?
B · Legal responsibility for offences punishable under the IT Act involving computer-related crimes
Criminal liability under the IT Act, 2000 refers to the legal responsibility for offences punishable under the Act related to computer crimes.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, criminal liability arises when a person:
B · Intentionally accesses a computer without authorization to commit an offence
Criminal liability arises when a person intentionally accesses a computer without authorization to commit an offence under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which element is essential to establish criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
B · Proof of intent (mens rea)
Proof of intent or mens rea is essential to establish criminal liability under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a computer offence attracting criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
D · Breach of contract for software licensing
Breach of contract is a civil matter and does not attract criminal liability under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which offence under the IT Act 2000 involves dishonestly receiving stolen computer resources or communication devices?
B · Section 66B - Receiving stolen computer resources
Section 66B deals with dishonestly receiving stolen computer resources or communication devices.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following offences under the IT Act 2000 involves tampering with computer source documents?
A · Section 65
Section 65 of the IT Act 2000 deals with tampering with computer source documents.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 prescribes punishment for identity theft?
A · Section 66C
Section 66C of the IT Act 2000 prescribes punishment for identity theft.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 deals with punishment for hacking with computer systems?
B · Section 66
Section 66 prescribes punishment for hacking under the IT Act 2000.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Section 67 of the IT Act 2000 primarily deals with offences related to:
A · Obscene electronic communication
Section 67 deals with publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section empowers the government to intercept, monitor or decrypt any information transmitted through any computer resource for security purposes?
B · Section 69
Section 69 empowers the government to intercept, monitor or decrypt information for security reasons.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 prescribes punishment for cyber terrorism?
A · Section 66F
Section 66F deals with cyber terrorism and prescribes punishment for it.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What is the maximum imprisonment term prescribed under Section 66C for identity theft under the IT Act 2000?
A · 3 years
Section 66C prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or a fine or both; however, the maximum term is 3 years, not 5. (Note: Correct answer should be 3 years; options adjusted accordingly.)
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, what is the punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service as per Section 66A?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine
Section 66A prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years and fine for sending offensive messages through communication service.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following penalties is prescribed under Section 65 for tampering with computer source documents?
A · Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to one lakh rupees or both
Section 65 prescribes imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to one lakh rupees or both for tampering with computer source documents.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which punishment is prescribed under Section 66F for cyber terrorism?
B · Imprisonment for life or imprisonment up to 10 years
Section 66F prescribes imprisonment for life or imprisonment up to 10 years for cyber terrorism.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which authority is primarily responsible for initiating prosecution under the IT Act 2000?
A · Police officer not below the rank of Inspector
The IT Act 2000 authorizes police officers not below the rank of Inspector to investigate and initiate prosecution.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Under the IT Act 2000, which of the following is a mandatory step before prosecution for certain offences?
A · Obtaining prior approval from the central government
Certain prosecutions under the IT Act require prior approval from the central government before proceeding.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which section of the IT Act 2000 provides for the protection of action taken in good faith during investigation or prosecution?
A · Section 79
Section 79 provides immunity to intermediaries for any third-party information or data hosted, provided due diligence is followed.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a procedural requirement for prosecution under the IT Act 2000?
A · Prosecution can be initiated only after a complaint is filed by a victim
Generally, prosecution under the IT Act requires a complaint by the victim or authorized person.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a key difference between civil and criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
C · Criminal liability involves punishment such as imprisonment or fine, civil liability involves compensation or damages
Criminal liability involves punishments like imprisonment or fines, whereas civil liability generally involves compensation or damages.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements correctly distinguishes criminal liability from civil liability under the IT Act 2000?
A · Criminal liability requires a higher standard of proof than civil liability
Criminal liability requires proof beyond reasonable doubt, which is a higher standard than the balance of probabilities in civil liability.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of criminal liability under the IT Act 2000 compared to civil liability?
C · Can be initiated by the victim only
Criminal liability can be initiated by the state or victim, but not only by the victim; civil suits are usually initiated by the victim.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
What role does 'mens rea' play in establishing criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
C · It denotes the guilty intention or knowledge behind the offence
Mens rea refers to the guilty intention or knowledge necessary to establish criminal liability.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best illustrates the role of mens rea in IT Act offences?
B · Intentional hacking to steal information
Intentional hacking demonstrates mens rea, which is required for criminal liability under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which statement is true regarding mens rea in IT Act criminal offences?
B · Mens rea must be proven unless the offence is strict liability
Mens rea must be proven for criminal offences unless the offence is one of strict liability.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following scenarios best demonstrates the application of criminal liability under the IT Act 2000?
B · A hacker intentionally accesses a bank's computer system to steal funds
Intentional unauthorized access to steal funds is a criminal offence under the IT Act.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In which case would criminal liability NOT be attracted under the IT Act 2000?
B · Accidental deletion of files without intent to harm
Accidental deletion without intent does not attract criminal liability as mens rea is absent.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the scenario: An employee intentionally alters source code to cause damage to the company’s software. Under which section of the IT Act 2000 is the employee liable?
A · Section 65
Section 65 deals with tampering with computer source documents, which applies here.
