In competitive exams, especially in the reasoning section, the ability to analyze statements and draw valid conclusions is crucial. This skill tests your logical thinking and comprehension abilities. But what exactly are statements and conclusions, and why is it important to distinguish between them?
A statement is a declarative sentence that conveys information which can be either true or false. A conclusion is a judgment or decision that logically follows from one or more statements. The challenge lies in determining whether a conclusion is definitely true, possibly true, or invalid based on the information given.
Understanding this difference helps you avoid common pitfalls such as assuming facts not stated or jumping to conclusions without evidence. This section will guide you step-by-step through the concepts, techniques, and practice needed to master this topic.
Let's begin by clearly defining what a statement is. A statement is a sentence that declares something and can be evaluated as either true or false. For example:
Statements can be further classified into two broad types:
| Fact | Opinion |
|---|---|
| The Indian Rupee (INR) is the currency of India. | The Indian Rupee is the most valuable currency in the world. |
| Water boils at 100°C at sea level. | Boiling water tastes better than cold water. |
| Delhi is the capital city of India. | Delhi is the most beautiful city in India. |
Why is this distinction important? Because conclusions can only be drawn logically from facts, not opinions. When analyzing reasoning questions, focus on factual statements to avoid errors.
A conclusion is a statement that you infer or deduce from one or more given statements. However, not all conclusions are equally strong. They fall into three categories:
graph TD A[Given Statement(s)] --> B{Analyze Conclusion} B --> C[Is conclusion always true?] C -->|Yes| D[Definite Conclusion] C -->|No| E{Is conclusion possibly true?} E -->|Yes| F[Possible Conclusion] E -->|No| G[Invalid Conclusion]Understanding these categories helps you answer questions accurately. For example, if a statement says, "All mangoes are sweet," a definite conclusion is "Some sweet fruits are mangoes." A possible conclusion might be "All sweet fruits are mangoes," but this is not definite. An invalid conclusion would be "No mangoes are sweet."
Logical deduction is the process of reasoning from given facts to reach a conclusion. To analyze statements and conclusions effectively, follow these steps:
graph TD A[Read the Statement Carefully] --> B[Identify Key Information] B --> C[Check for Explicit Facts] C --> D[Look for Implicit Assumptions] D --> E[Evaluate Each Conclusion] E --> F{Does Conclusion Follow?} F -->|Yes| G[Mark as Definite or Possible] F -->|No| H[Eliminate as Invalid]Step 1: Read the statement carefully and underline or note important facts.
Step 2: Identify what is explicitly stated and what is implied but not directly mentioned.
Step 3: Evaluate each conclusion against the statement, checking if it must be true, could be true, or cannot be true.
Step 4: Use the elimination method to discard invalid conclusions quickly.
For example, if a statement says, "Some cars are electric," a conclusion like "All cars are electric" is invalid, while "Some cars are not electric" is possible.
Step 1: The statement says all pens in the box are blue. This means every pen inside is blue.
Step 2: The conclusion says some blue pens are in the box. Since all pens are blue, some blue pens definitely exist in the box.
Answer: The conclusion definitely follows from the statement.
Step 1: From statement 1, some fruits are mangoes.
Step 2: From statement 2, all mangoes are sweet.
Step 3: Therefore, those fruits which are mangoes are also sweet.
Answer: The conclusion definitely follows.
Step 1: The statement clearly says no student is absent, so all are present.
Step 2: Conclusion 1 says all students are present - this matches the statement.
Step 3: Conclusion 2 says some students are absent - this contradicts the statement.
Answer: Conclusion 1 definitely follows, Conclusion 2 is invalid.
Step 1: The statement says rain causes the ground to be wet (if rain -> wet ground).
Step 2: The conclusion says the ground is wet only if it has rained (wet ground -> rain), which is the reverse.
Step 3: The statement does not say the ground cannot be wet for other reasons (like watering plants).
Answer: The conclusion is invalid because it assumes a reverse implication not given.
Step 1: From statement 1, all teachers are educated.
Step 2: From statement 2, some educated people are doctors.
Step 3: Statement 3 says no doctor is a teacher, so teachers and doctors are mutually exclusive groups.
Step 4: Conclusion A: "Some teachers are not doctors" - since no teacher is a doctor, this is definitely true.
Step 5: Conclusion B: "Some doctors are not educated" - contradicts statement 2 which says some educated people are doctors, but does not say all doctors are educated. So this conclusion is possible, not definite.
Answer: Conclusion A definitely follows, Conclusion B is possible.
When to use: At the start of every question to avoid misinterpretation.
When to use: When multiple conclusions are given to quickly narrow down options.
When to use: When distinguishing between definite and possible conclusions.
When to use: For questions involving several statements and multiple conclusions.
When to use: To improve speed and accuracy in competitive exams.
Progress tracking is paywalled — subscribe to mark subtopics as understood and save your streak.
Go to practice →