Login
OR
Don't worry. We'll fix this for you!
In forestry, managing trees for sustainable wood production and ecological balance has led to the development of various silvicultural systems. Two traditional and widely practiced systems are coppicing and pollarding. Both involve cutting trees to encourage regrowth, but differ in cutting height, purpose, and management.
Coppicing is an ancient practice dating back thousands of years, used globally for producing fuelwood, fencing materials, and small timber. Pollarding, similarly traditional, has been used to protect regrowth from grazing animals by cutting trees at a height above browsing level. Today, these systems remain relevant in India and worldwide for sustainable forest management, biodiversity conservation, and economic benefits.
Understanding these systems helps foresters optimize wood production while maintaining forest health and meeting local community needs.
Coppicing is a silvicultural system where trees are cut close to the ground, typically at a height of 5 to 15 cm above soil level. This cutting stimulates the growth of multiple new shoots from the remaining stump, called a stool. These shoots grow vigorously and can be harvested after a certain rotation period, which depends on species and site conditions.
The main objectives of coppicing are to produce small-diameter wood repeatedly without replanting, conserve soil, and enhance biodiversity by creating a varied forest structure.
Common species used in coppicing include Sal (Shorea robusta), Teak (Tectona grandis), and Acacia species, which respond well to stool regeneration.
Rotation periods for coppicing vary from 3 to 20 years depending on species and intended use. Short rotations produce fuelwood, while longer rotations yield poles or small timber.
Ecological benefits include improved soil protection due to dense ground cover, increased light penetration fostering understory plants, and habitat diversity supporting wildlife.
Pollarding is a silvicultural system where trees are cut at a height above ground level, usually between 1.5 to 3 meters. This elevated cutting protects new shoots from browsing by animals such as deer, goats, or cattle.
After cutting, the tree produces new branches from the cut points, which can be harvested periodically. Pollarding is especially useful in areas with heavy grazing pressure where coppicing would fail due to shoot damage.
Species suitable for pollarding include Acacia nilotica, Ficus species, and Sal, which can tolerate repeated cutting and produce vigorous regrowth.
Pollarding rotations typically range from 5 to 15 years, depending on species growth rates and economic goals. This system is common in agroforestry and urban forestry where protection from animals is essential.
| Feature | Coppicing | Pollarding |
|---|---|---|
| Cutting Height | Near ground level (5-15 cm) | Above ground, 1.5 to 3 m height |
| Regrowth Type | Multiple shoots from stool (stump) | New branches from pollard head |
| Protection from Browsing | Low (shoots vulnerable) | High (cutting height prevents animal browsing) |
| Typical Species | Sal, Teak, Acacia | Acacia nilotica, Ficus, Sal |
| Rotation Period | 3-20 years | 5-15 years |
| Uses | Fuelwood, poles, small timber | Fodder, firewood, branches for crafts |
| Advantages | Simple, low cost, soil conservation | Protects regrowth, suitable for grazed areas |
| Disadvantages | Vulnerable to browsing, limited to certain species | Requires more skill, may reduce tree longevity |
| Feature | Coppicing | Pollarding |
|---|---|---|
| Cutting Height | Near ground (5-15 cm) | Above ground (1.5-3 m) |
| Regrowth | Shoots from stool | Branches from pollard head |
| Animal Protection | Low | High |
| Rotation | 3-20 years | 5-15 years |
| Uses | Fuelwood, poles | Fodder, firewood |
Step 1: Identify the formula for total volume yield from coppice stools:
\[ V = N \times v_s \]
where:
Step 2: Substitute the given values:
\( N = 1500 \), \( v_s = 0.12 \, m³ \)
\[ V = 1500 \times 0.12 = 180 \, m³ \]
Answer: The total harvestable volume is 180 cubic meters per hectare.
Step 1: Understand the formula:
\[ R = \frac{C}{G} \]
where:
Step 2: Substitute the values:
\( C = 3000 \, INR \), \( G = 0.025 \, m³/year \)
\[ R = \frac{3000}{0.025} = 120,000 \, \text{years} \]
Note: This unrealistic result indicates the formula requires consistent units or additional economic parameters such as price per volume. Instead, consider the formula as a simplified model; in practice, rotation is chosen based on biological growth and market demand.
Answer: The rotation period should be determined by balancing growth rates with economic returns, typically between 5 to 15 years for pollarding.
Step 1: Calculate cost per cubic meter for coppicing:
\[ \text{Cost per m}^3 = \frac{\text{Cost per rotation}}{\text{Yield per hectare}} = \frac{20,000}{180} = 111.11 \, INR/m^3 \]
Step 2: Calculate cost per cubic meter for pollarding:
\[ \text{Cost per m}^3 = \frac{25,000}{150} = 166.67 \, INR/m^3 \]
Step 3: Compare the two:
Coppicing: INR 111.11/m³
Pollarding: INR 166.67/m³
Answer: Coppicing is more cost-effective in this scenario, costing less per cubic meter of wood produced.
Step 1: In coppicing, cutting near ground level removes most above-ground biomass but leaves the stool intact. This stimulates multiple shoots to sprout from dormant buds on the stool, leading to dense regrowth.
Step 2: In pollarding, cutting at a higher level preserves the root system and some stem tissue. Regrowth occurs as branches from the pollard head, which are less accessible to grazing animals.
Answer: Lower cutting height in coppicing promotes shoot regeneration from the base, while higher cutting in pollarding encourages branch regrowth protected from browsing.
Step 1: Identify species adapted to dry, sandy soils and capable of vigorous stool regeneration.
Step 2: Species like Acacia nilotica and Shorea robusta (Sal) are well suited due to their drought tolerance and ability to coppice effectively.
Answer: Acacia nilotica and Sal are suitable for coppicing on this site because they tolerate soil and climatic conditions and regenerate well after cutting.
When to use: When distinguishing between silvicultural systems during exams or practical applications.
When to use: During numerical problems involving yield estimation.
When to use: When planning silvicultural systems or answering application-based questions.
When to use: During revision and multiple-choice questions.
When to use: In numerical and case study questions involving cost-benefit analysis.
Progress tracking is paywalled — subscribe to mark subtopics as understood and save your streak.
Go to practice →
Your Score
Your Rank
| Rank | Name | Score |
|---|
